Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > That's only a reasonable thing to do if you can also offer an > assurance like "Your explanations will be listened to with respect, > and you won't need to read thousand-message threads attacking your > commitment to the values of the project over your decisions."
Packagers make their decision publicly in buglogs and changelogs all the time. I'm just asking for a similar kind of log of decisions made and reasons stated. > But compare that with, eg, the casual implication of James being a > perfect example of incompetence in "So this isn't really a James Troup > question, it's a question of how much screw-up is necessary before a > delegation should be yanked?" from the exchange with Andreas you > posted earlier. Or Enrico's post on Project Scud from last week. Or > however many other messages. Um, since you don't know at all what that was about, you can't assume (incorrectly) that you know what it said. Hint: it did not say that James Troup was a "perfect example of incompetence". Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
