Hello, I would like to know your opinion about the discrimination of the contrib and non-free parts of the Debian archive(*).
Do you think that hidding important pieces of software does serve our users? (with or without the bug license teaching messages) The best example for the current practice is removal of the question about adding contrib/non-free in apt-setup, which has now a low priority which means it is _hidden_ for a normal installation and so effectively disappeared in every normal installation. Thanks, Eduard. (*) some people claim that contrib and non-free are not part of Debian but they use their own definition (Debian==main archive) which I do not talk about. What I mean is the whole Debian distribution as seen by the majority of the users.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
