On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 03:04:26PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Given the DPL's role involves a fair amount of travel, speaking, giving > interviews to the press, etc, do you think that you will have sufficient > time to do a good job as DPL given your other commitments to Debian?
I believe so. I expect the monthly reports I have pledged to make to the developers to generate feedback that will help keep me committed to this objective. > How do you see your other responsibilities within Debian suffering as a > result of you being elected DPL? They don't necessarily have to suffer. My most critical packages are team-maintained, not maintained by me exclusively. > Why is Debian better served by having you as DPL rather than in your > current role? Debian has bigger problems to face than technical flaws in packages I maintain or co-maintain. As I argued in my platform[1], I have more to offer the Debian Project than simply technical competence in package maintainership. [1] http://people.debian.org/~branden/dpl/campaign/2005/platform.xhtml#s4 -- G. Branden Robinson | I have a truly elegant proof of the Debian GNU/Linux | above, but it is too long to fit [EMAIL PROTECTED] | into this .signature file. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
