Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > Not in that sense, but that sense doesn't follow directly from > > the word "policy". I'd expect someone consistently ignoring it > > to be corrected, but ICBW. > It's not policy regardless. It's a recommendation about what will > make the list more useful and pleasant.
I refer you to a dictionary, sorry. > > > If you think this is *wrong*, then why? Because you have a right to > > > be responded to no matter what you say, even when you are hostile to > > > the purposes the list was created for? > > I'm not hostile to balancing debian's composition. I'm hostile > > to discrimination, but I was told that wasn't a list purpose: > > are you saying it is? Why do you know better than others? I notice that you do not directly answer any question. > The list discriminates on the basis of *topic*, but not on the basis > of the gender of the *contributor*. Get it? Why do you think that is the case? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
