The current Technical Committee is inactive; in the past two years they have only made two rulings:
* 2004-06-24 Bug #254598: amd64 is a fine name for that architecture.
* 2004-06-05 Bug #164591, Bug #164889: md5sum </dev/null should
produce the bare md5sum value.
The md5sum ruling was a bug submitted, referred and decided by the
Technical Committee chairman. In effect, he used his power in such a
manner to expect that any bug he files will lead to a tech-ctte
decision.
Do you believe that the tech-ctte should be relatively inactive? Or do
you believe that an inactive Technical Committee is a bad thing?
If the latter, do you propose (as they would be your delegates) to make
any changes to the current make-up of the committee.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
