Op wo, 09-03-2005 te 09:00 +0000, schreef Henning Makholm:
> Scripsit Angus Lees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm concerned that the long-term goal is going to suffer by forcing
> > users to make the choice between (a) going somewhere else or (b)
> > exposing themselves to poorly supported software from non-free.
>
> "Exposing themselves???" Why do you think the software is
> intrinsically poorer simply because it is in non-free rather than in
> main?
He didn't say that; he said that the software is poorly supported in
non-free. And that is correct:
* non-free is not autobuilt
* non-free does not receive security updates
* non-free does not end up on the CD-ROM images we distribute
(hence, users installing from CD-ROM because they have a bad
Internet connection /will/ have problems installing it).
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
