Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, but I see no point in discussing licensing issues with a dozen of > people who keep saying that they reached consensus a couple of years > ago and I should shut up, so I tend to avoid most threads.
Frankly, I remember more posts of short contradictions than discussion. However, if you disagree with someone but are willing to do what they say, that's your choice. I feel it's wrong of you to then go around rubbishing debian contributors in other media because of it. Please act about the source of your unhappiness. I suggest the best method is to discuss rather than contradict and try to destroy. Then again, I suspect I disagree with people about that approach. When I posted in another vote thread, I tried to explain why I believe a particular thing, but still was told I needed to be "somewhat more reasonable" which sucks. I expect to be challenged about the basis for things not obviously true, not on whether my expression is reasonable. Any road, I realised we don't all use the same language, even when all writing English. Try tabling an idea around here... -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Subscribed to this list. No need to Cc, thanks. Accept-Language: salcey, dezbru, en, eo, fr, de, nl ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
