Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marco subscribes to the notion that the DFSG was originally only meant > to apply to ELF binaries, and anything else is de jure free. Anybody > who says different, including anybody who was around at the time, can > be dismissed as a 'revisionist'.
Marco d'Itri appears to support the "DFSG as a religion" concept. I don't mind disagreeing with people, but it's very frustrating to have self-appointed zealots constantly sniping. Even self- appointed zealots joining in discussions are a bit better. It often has not been possible to include Marco d'Itri's view in consensus because he seems to simply contradict others without explanation. I think he is just reading the list to gather blog flamebait. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
