MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you cannot substantiate them publicly, then they are nothing more > > than pissing in the wind. > > Get Message-Id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > that was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it matters that much to you. I > don't have a copy here and I've not checked my copyright situation. > > I'm sorry for putting too much emphasis on one example.
But one example *cannot* demonstrate your point. DWN is not obligated to publish everything, therefore the fact that a singular thing is not published does not and cannot prove bias. Nor, for that matter, does a Message-ID prove anything. You can't say or remember what's in that message, can you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
