MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark, [...]
That reminds me of one thing that has annoyed me during tbm's leadership (sorry tbm! You have done most things well): it has been very difficult to correct the bastard form of my name listed on db.d.o that was caused by a misconfigured mailserver years ago. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] address seems like an alias for /dev/null and the DPL directed a complaint back to it. This is why I suspect ftpmaster is a particular instance of some more general problem. At the moment, is there a constititional loophole that one can avoid tech-ctte overruling one (the only time complaints are mentioned) by never acting? 1. Will DPL candidates try to address delegate communication in general? Deal with each case individually? 2. How would the candidate deal with complaints? Is it part of the DPL's role, in your opinion? If not, whose? I note Branden's 2004 platform answers 2 in part and it's one of the few places "complaint" is found on the main web site. As ever, this is just a point-observation which might be wildly atypical. I don't really interact with DPL as DPL very often. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Subscribed to this list. No need to Cc, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
