On Thursday 03 March 2005 04:41, Anthony Towns wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > I would like to know from the DPL candidates what is their opinion on way > > the ftp-masters handle the NEW queue, > > I think this is the wrong question. The right question to ask is what > the ftpmasters think of the way NEW is being handled, and what resources > they would appreciate. There's two reasons for this. One is the whole > point of having people running a particular area is that they know > what's going on; given the choice between a specialist's analysis of the > problems and a generalist's, take the former.
Dear candidates! Since the DPL should be a specialist in leadership and social issues: Please discuss the social differences between debian-release and debian-kernel on the one side and the buildd admins and ftpmasters on the other side. Explain the differences in public opinion about the groups. Take the opportunity to identify other positive and negative examples for team development within Debian. [The following question is of course biased by my own opinion about the first paragraph, please feel free to ignore and/or modify this, if it doesn't fit into your argumentation.] In the light of the recent change of the NM-Queue from the second into the first group, please explain what you think caused this improvement and how (or why not) the lessons learned can (or cannot) be applied to rectifying the above identified social problem zones. Thanks for your time and your resolve to lead Debian for the next year! Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;) -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
