On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 17:33, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >"3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > > What decision has been made? Has there actually been a rejection of the > inclusion?
Refusal to act is a decision and a rejection. > If so, on what grounds was it made? If the ftp-masters > believe that the mirroring issue needs to be dealt with first, I think > that attempting to override them would be foolish - we don't want to > lose good-will with our mirrors. We can't know what the ftp-masters believe, since they refuse to communicate; this issue has been raised for at least a month on the lists without any comment from them (that I have seen). No project can work if its key members operate like that. Communication is an essential skill. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/A54310EA 92C8 39E7 280E 3631 3F0E 1EC0 5664 7A2F A543 10EA ======================================== "Let your character be free from the love of money, being content with what you have; for He Himself has said, "I will never desert you, nor will I ever forsake you." Hebrews 13:5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
