On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > Andreas made an ill-formed proposal which the project secretary > > > rejected for this ballot, and refused all suggestions about how it > > > should be properly formed. He appears to hold a grudge, I'm not sure > > > why. > > > > Ah, never retain from a ad-hominem attacks, eh? > > Oh, come on. That was not an argument, therefore it cannot *possibly* > be an instance of argumentum ad hominem.
Andreas didn't say "argument", he said "attack".
This is a tangent, though. Let's cut it.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
