On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > I would point out that historically, Debian does not release before it > > is ready, and that's why our releases usually work so well. Option 3 > > is the "release before it is ready, because releasing is more > > important than being ready" option. Option 6 is the "better rather > > than sooner" option. > > Non sequitur - the premise is vaguely correct, but I disagree that the two > conclusions follow from it. It doesn't make sense to me that readiness and > usability of Debian releases are to be achieved by removing stuff that > was not supposed to be removed just a while ago.
Only if you take it as a given that the old release policy was correct. Otherwise it's just that heads have been forcibly removed from the sand now. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
