On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 12:33:25AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > This is a major factor contributing to my belief that such a transition > *guide* should not be given the status of a foundation document. I
Foundation documents lay foundations, and I don't see how a "transition" document lays a foundation--transition plans are support, not foundation. I think putting a transition guide on a level with the Social Contract is strange. (However, I havn't been following this GR very closely.) -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
