On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > For images, fonts, and sounds, he makes an exception for the source > code requirement. For many of these, there is no sensible source code > anyway, and so DFSG 2 doesn't require it. That is, the image is > itself the source code.
That's a statement I would like to know whether it is accepted by all the other developers? I think I agree (without having thought this through a lot), but I was not aware that this was the standard way of interpreting things, certainly not after the recent dicussions. For example, people say that our logo was non-free. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
