On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:08:05PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 04:02:47PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > No, you need 46 people and only three quarters of them need agree. > > That is less than 4% of our developer community.
(My mistake; each valid option must have at least the quorum number of votes more than the default, meaning that you actually need 46 developers to agree and that's 5%. Thanks to Manoj for clarification.) > That's a mischaracterisation. You also need *all* the other developers > to be absent or apathetic. Apparently not difficult to arrange, if you dress it up as something mundane and technical in a language foreign to many of our developers. > If that were the case then there's a great > deal of dead weight, and it would indeed be reasonable to pass the > change without them. Not to this extreme, I think. Cheers Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
