Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a minority a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is looking.
Like "normally" is used in a vote-related discussion to get people to accept an assertion in the absence of evidence for that norm?
"Editorial" has a sense of the editorial opinion column of a newspaper, too. I'm not saying what the intent was in this case, but anyway, someone voting on only the title may be voting randomly. Not much you can do about that.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
