[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > I don't see a mess. Ted Ts'o tried to apply an inappropriate standard > to the question of fonts, and got an absurd result. I think it was > just a simple mistake. Ted's a really smart guy, and I think he just > automatically substituted the GPL's definition of "source code", > without realizing or even noticing that the DFSG does not have that > definition. > > Once one realizes that, the problem evaporates (and with it, the > "current mess").
Why do you think so? I'd still like to have some hinted non-METAFONT DFSG-compliant fonts. And I view the lack thereof an actual problem which has bothered me for a long time. -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
