On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 12:47:58PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > More specifically, if glibc requires a binary component (a current > > version of the glibc binaries) for its source to be built, then glibc > > isn't distributable under the GPL.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:16:23PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > I've heard that there are a couple of hundred other packages which need > a current version of libc binaries to build. They are called 'C > programs'. We've even invented stuff like Build-Depends for them. As long as glibc itself is free that won't be a problem. If glibc is not free, we have a much, much larger problem. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
