On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:51:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:29:28PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > A long campaigning period still does not result in perfect > > > information. Given that I have to make a decision in the face of > > > incomplete information, the possibility of getting relevant > > > information ought not to be dismissed. > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > In that case I wonder why no rebuttals were posted and why the IRC > > debate was called off, if obviously there is more need for information > > and discussion. > > Judgement call? > > Maybe those judgement calls could have been better, but "we've got plenty > of campaign information on debian-vote, we don't need to add another > forum" is not at all equivalent to "let's stop using debian-vote for > this kind of traffic".
Anyway, I don't want to imply that I'm unhappy with the current process or even Manoj. I was just pointing out my opinion. If others think it's worthy to keep on going, that's fine with me. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
