On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:59:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:38:08AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:02:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Also, i will not speak again about this, since it is evident that you > > > asked us, me and aj nominally, to use clearer language on this, and > > > refuse to do the same, playing on the confusion. > > > > > > And now that you are aware of that, please refrain from using > > > voluntarily confusing terms in the future. > > > > I still believe that this GR would be useful to reduce the amount of > > confusion about these naming issues, should it pass. > > This GR ? I guess the most reasonable thing to do would be, once the > decision is made on what we want to do with non-free, to propose a > second GR to clarify the language accordyingly to the desire of the > Debian Project (as in those who cared enough to vote).
What I mean is that should this GR pass, there is no more ambiguity on what is part of Debian* and what is not. Whether we want to clarify the syntactic or semantic or whatever sugar of (the) Debian (project|distribution), is only a cosmetic issue then. But nevertheless worth fixing I guess, it just would not have a big practical impact anymore. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
