On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 01:53:30AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > One of the main argument, used by Branden if i remember well, was that > > removing non-free from the debian infrastructure would force authors of > > non-free packages to revise their licence, or users to consider > > alternatives. > > > > Exactly in what way does this still be true if there is a an alternative > > non-free.org archive ? > > I can't answer this question; I'm not responsible for Branden's > arguments.
So that does mean, that this argument is not one you (and Mj Ray) think are the reason for moving non-free out of the debian archive ? I guess Raul is right, and that the non-free removal GR should indeed propose a rationale saying exactly why it is a good idea. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
