On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 11:25:14AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > However, in this case, the proposal should say something like: "The > non-free software that was distributed via Debians archive is now > moved to ..., and the clause 5 of the SC is dropped."
Andrew made it quite clear that he thinks implementation details which do not pertain to Debian should not be part of the resolution, and I agree. It could be part of a seperate rationale though, I guess and be communicated to the people eligable to vote. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
