On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 01:17:13AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:As you write it, this is an unreasonable demand: who judges it?"who judges" is a trivially easy question to answer: "we all do". when no
debian developer can be bothered producing a non-free package, that's
sufficient proof that there is no more need for non-free packages.
I already dealt with that unreasonable position in another email.
btw, it's not at all unreasonable to expect uninvolved third-parties (i.e. you
bigots) to mind their own business.
It's not at all unreasonable to expect you pro-non-free bigots to shut up and let us actually use the decision process we have, instead of saying "don't mention the non-free. I did once, but I think I got away with it." If you still want to package or use non-free, then express your view. If the decision goes against you, maintain it some place else. Quit trying to sabotage the project by insisting we must irrationally keep non-free after its support has waned too much.
Again, I see you have "seconded" something which we still don't know is mule or fowl. Do you think you seconded an amendment or a new proposal?
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
