On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 07:52:10PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Editorial amendments to the social contract
> I believe that both of these GRs can begin the SRP immediately. They > were designed to be mutually independent so they can run in parallel. I know I've been avoiding commenting on the editorial changes in any detail while it's unclear what we actually want to social contract to say; I suspect others have done likewise. I'll certainly be advocating further discussion if the editorial changes issue comes to vote before the non-free issue's been decided. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could. http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature