If a license contaminate other software, we very probably can't include
it into non-free, as other non-free package won't follow this rule. So
such a package is not distributable by debian.
That probably doesn't follow. There may be limits to the contamination (such as media type) which prevent it hurting debian's non-free archives. For example, combining classes A-C and E of the "4F License" of http://u-os.org/4f/ would seem to produce a licence like that. (I recommend against using 4F, even though it doesn't have this particular problem.)
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
