On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:36:56PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > non-free is so tiny that whoever maintains it would only need one > > machine, preferably with quite some bandwidth though (I don't know how > > easy it would be to get mirrors for that) > > The issue is support. Uptime, package integration, bugs and fixes, etc.
Uptime and infrastructure (including archive, BTS and perhaps PTS[1]) would be provided by the maintainer and/or sponsor of nonfree.org I guess. The rest (package integration, bug fixes) will be done by the package maintainer, should they decide to keep their non-free packages, or whoever[2] adopts them. Michael [1] Anything else I forgot? An admin mailing-list might be alright, but that's a no-brainer I guess. [2] Obviously I cannot force policy, but having a GPG-key in the debian keyring or at least an advocate with his signature on the key should be the requirement for non-free package maintainers, IMHO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
