On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 08:39, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 02:13:53PM +0100, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote: > > Dropping non-free (and associated SC clause) will mean preventing Debian > > developers from acting non-ethical. If I don't have Windows XP, it will > > be ethical to reject a request to distribute it, since I do not have it. > > Dropping non-free will have no affect, one way or the other, on Debian > distributing Windows XP.
I think he used XP as an example. Substitute in "X" if you prefer:
If I don't have X, it will be ethical to reject a request to
distribute X, since I do not have X.
HTH.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
