On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 08:17:39AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:26:30PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Ok, will you help me draft something, i am not really a good > > administrative writer, but was thinking about something like : > > > > ---- begin of draft Poll to be submitted to vote ---- > > Why would we want something non-binding? I cannot think of a single > situation in which that will actually resolve anything.
Why not ? Once we have the result of this, first it will put a stop to the whole speculation on what the DDs really want and enable us to go forward constructively than all this mess that is surrounding this question, and second, we can then propose a 3:1 social contract GR, which will benefit from an idea of what will happen later. Like, you know, if the majority of the DDs want to keep non-free, then there is no sense in having the social contract GR remove the words about the non-free issue, and we can have a clean GR which only does the nice cosmetic changes Branden has proposed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
