On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:37:44PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > >> I thought I answered, but all together now: absence of evidence is > >> not > >> evidence of absence. > > Word play. I don't care about this, i care about the intentions behind > > the word, and what will actually happen. > > Not just word play, as there is a large difference between the two. > The point I wanted to remind people that it's not really safe to draw > many conclusions from non-response, which you didn't. I think the > non-response is unremarkable and I thought I responded, anyway.
Actually, absence of evidence really is evidence of absence. It's just not conclusive evidence. Or maybe there really is a little unicorn in your sock drawer. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
