On 2004-01-06 13:47:18 +0000 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's not a word game, it's honest ignorance of the fact that you were
holding part of your discussion in this forum and part in another.
The discussion is not taking place in another forum. It should be fairly easy to discover that I have not run debian infrastructure and I think Anthony knew it already.
Then the proper way to respond would be with a reference to that other forum.
Other subthreads, not another forum.
[...] your claims of hidden meanings.What claims are you talking about?
Things like 'You've claimed that non-free, as it currently exists "hinders debian"' or 'your claims that the content you're talking about are on some other forum'. There are many more examples littering this thread.
His numbers were to illustrate a point -- a point which you have studiously ignored. [...]
I "studiously ignored" it with a reply disagreeing with his estimates.
In other words, his numbers were imprecise, but not inaccurate.
"not inaccurate"? Isn't that "accurate"? If you think those numbers are accurate, you are beyond reason.
[... NM questions ...] How is this relevant to the current thread?
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it was asserted that there's nothing special about DDs over non-DDs. I disagreed and you contradicted me. The questions were an attempt to understand why.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
