> > > There are tons of those already, many in wide use. download.kde.org, > > > backports.org, and the bunk backport collection all come to mind. I don't > > > see this as big stumbling block.
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:15:22PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > Both of which represent far larger efforts than non-free. On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:42:42PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > So it should be trivial to do for non-free, right? If even those > (moderatly sized) backports collections can be maintained. Maintaining infrastructure has a constant cost (setting up and maintaining the machines, letting people know where they are, ...) and some "per package" costs. The "per package" costs are, indeed, trivial. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
