One effect of removing non-free from Debian [...]
This is confusing. non-free is not in Debian, so it cannot be removed from it.
Both of those are bad for Debian -- reimplementing infrastructure sucks up
time and energy of maintainers on work that doesn't benefit free software;
Support for non-free already does this, although we disagree about how much.
and reducing the available support for our users who need non-free software
makes their lives more painful, or encourages them to switch to a different
distribution.
Or it may encourage them to move to free software, making their lives easier, especially if we provide good migration help as suggested by some current non-free users.
[...]
One way of demonstrating that the effort is trivial is to setup all that
infrastructure.
Besides the obvious absurdity, I suspect that some of the suggestors will vote against even if this is done. People who want it should set it up when it is needed.
People who disagree with the use of a separate non-free repository surely
wouldn't be arguing for its creation, though, no?
Yes, apparently.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
