On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 06:36:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:44:05PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > If not, how are dependencies from contrib on non-free software to be > > > treated? Should the dependencies of contrib packages just be ignored > > > version of libc6 only available in unstable or experimental? Or should > > > contrib packages not depend explicitly on non-free packages at all? Or > > > should something else happen? > > Implementation details. This stuff should not be written into a GR, > > any more than every other change to policy. > > Well, the right answers aren't obvious to me; but if no one else cares, > I'm all for dropping contrib too. That's certainly the least work.
And to be complete, all the non-free installers. And all the non-free documentation in main. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
