On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 02:54:31PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > b. A defeat (A,X) is weaker than a defeat (B,Y) if A is not > > the default option and V(A,X) is less than V(B,Y). Also, > > (A,X) is weaker than (B,Y) A is not the default option and if > > V(A,X) is equal to V(B,Y) and V(X,A) is greater than V(Y,B).
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:04:40PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > I think you left out the definition of weaker for the default > option, no? Correct. I did this intentionally. Any option defeated by the default option is a "bad choice" at the time of this election. > Other comments on the draft: > > - Please use either tabs or spaces consistently. ;-) I don't notice this much, but I'll give try running the next draft through col -bx. > - Not handling general (non int-1) supermajority ratios would be > silly. As long as it will be understood that the n in n:1 > need not be a whole number, there's no problem. But it might > be better to mention this possibility explicitly. Uh... can you express what the ambiguity is? [I've only got a few moments here for a reply, I'll try figuring this one out tomorrow.] Thanks, -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
