-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 18 Dec 2000 10:29:06 -0600,
on Re: What next?,
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> digest. And I still think I would not be able to defend the method to
> someone uninitiated; I need to go look for the papers on the voting
> methods to be sure of my footing on this.
> However, I am willing to trust Raul and AJ to have researched
> the underlying method, and the language is clean and understandable,
> and thus I am willing to be a second for this proposal.
Just say "me, too". I wish to see the things proceed, so here I second
for the proposal described in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
- --
Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE6Pq4j0LPz0K4xwAkRAmsFAJwPd3GiCiz9mW6HS9Rs54rk2ggZeACbBrzJ
onSG27lQY6T7PM6EFJNcLu8=
=iG3H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
