> > I was talking about the smith/condorcet mechanism. On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:51:28AM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote: > You may have been talking about it, but you didn't apply it properly. > The SC method I described said "drop the weakest defeat from the Smith > set until there is an undefeated option". I know. See my reply to Anthony on this same topic. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Buddha Buck
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Buddha Buck
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- RE: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Norman Petry
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Anthony Towns
- Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONA... Raul Miller