Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Shall we stop muzzling other people and just get on with > finding what peoples opinions are on these crucial issues so we can > all get a collectivce move on? If you are asserting that we must never muzzle people, I agree completely. I never said we should muzzle anybody. I said that, in my opinion, it would be unwise for the Interpreter Of The Constitution to become an advocate for one side or another when issues are likely (indeed, have) come up in that regard. I would much prefer that the Interpreter Of The Constitution get down to brass tacks, and do some Interpreting and Issuing Of Ballots and Announcing Of Results. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Anthony Towns
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Seth Arnold
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Buddha Buck
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Manoj Srivastava
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Josip Rodin
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Raul Miller
- Re: The constitution and the social contract Josip Rodin