[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert D. Hilliard) writes: > This is the heart of the matter. It is akin to the U.S. > controversy over `activist' judges, who rule based on their beliefs of > what should be, rather than on what the law says. At least in U.S. > jurisprudence several levels of appellate review are available. Under > the Debian Constitution no such appeals are available. This is a far > more important point than the fate of John's GR. But under the Debian Constitution, it's pretty easy to override the Secretary's judgement. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Raul Miller
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Buddha Buck
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities John Goerzen
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Branden Robinson
- Summary of voting irregularities Matthew Vernon
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Joseph Carter
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Robert D. Hilliard
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Branden Robinson
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Branden Robinson
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Raul Miller
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Branden Robinson
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Branden Robinson
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities "Jürgen A. Erhard"
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Joseph Carter
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Hamish Moffatt
- Re: Summary of voting irregularities Raul Miller