On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 03:06:49AM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote: > constitution's lead rather than trying to make an end-run around it, I > will simply offer my personal opinion that given the opportunity I'd like > to see the language forcing Debian to maintain non-free removed from the > social contract. At that point, Debian would be free to maintain the > non-free archive without social contract bounds on how much or how long. Why not scrap the whole document now, so that we don't have to go to the trouble of changing in the future? Sounds very efficient. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Gopal Narayanan
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Anthony Towns
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Shane Wegner
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Joseph Carter
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Brendan O'Dea
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Joseph Carter
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Raul Miller
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution... Raul Miller
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson