On Wednesday 14 April 2004 4:29 am, Will Trillich wrote: > here i brainstorm to conjure up some naming scheme possibilities > (referring to current status as of 13 apr 2004): > > sid -- alternatives to "UNSTABLE": > - "UNKNOWN" > - "DANGEROUS" > - "CAVORT" > - "UNCERTAIN" > - "BEWARE" > > sarge -- alternatives to "TESTING": > - "SOON" > - "NEARLY" > - "UPCOMING" > - "ALMOST" > - "NOT YET" > > woody -- alternatives to "STABLE": > - "SOLID" > - "DEPENDABLE" > - "READY" > - "SERIOUS" > - "STABLE" (heck, what could be more precise? :) > > think of names that might help the debian-uninitiated grok a tad > more quickly the functionality and dependability of the release.
I use the following names on IRC: Debian Broken (unstable) Debian Old (Testing) Debian Stale (Stable) <tongue firmly in cheek> -- "You should realize Usenet is a strange reality where you see people beating up a patch of grass where nine years ago there used to be a horse. " 01 July 2003, talk.origins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
