Cameron Hutchison wrote: > Once upon a time Stefan Bellon said... [snip]
> > I copied the old contents of /etx/X11/fvmw/* to my ~/.fvwm so that > > I maintain the state that I had until two days ago. But somehow > > this is still unsatisfying. > I went into /etc/X11/fvwm and copied all the .dpkg-old files back to > their original names, and copied DebianMenu to menudefs.hook. Essentially I have done the same. I know created one single .fvwm2rc file which contained all the stuff from /etc/X11/fvwm and my post.hook file. Only one hook is present now, the menudefs.hook as the other have been discarded. [snip] > Overall, I'd have to say I'm very disappointed with the approach > taken with fvwm 2.5 with regard to keeping existing configurations > working. There was quite an elaborate system for being able to hook > personal configuration into the system wide configuration, which > encouraged you to use these hooks rather than use your own complete > fvwmrc. To now turn around and break all that with a small notice in > the NEWS file, saying it has been done because of some new fancy > configuration utility - to encourage people to use this new utility - > is quite disrespectful to the users who have followed the system for > configuring fvwm. A more orderly transition should have been planned. I completely agree. I couldn't have worded it better! -- Stefan Bellon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
