-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:17:14 -0600 Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 2004-03-26T16:52:55Z, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Inline PGP is fading from popularity, broken clients be damned. > > The only reason I ever use inline signatures is that members of some > newsgroups absolutely have a conniption when they see attachments. See > this thread where otherwise presumably intelligent people fail to > understand that a PGP signature is not a virus: I always use inline signatures for the same reason, many mailing lists and newsgroups frown on attachments of any kind. In addition many of the people I correspond with use M$ Outlook which not only doesn't understand PGP-MIME but hides the body of the message when PGP-MIME attachments are present. So my dilemma is that I want my messages PGP signed, but PGP-MIME prevents me from communicating with my business partners. So far, inline signatures are the only solution. Has anyone found a decent work around to this Outlook problem? (and don't tell me to get them to switch off of Outlook. like the proverbial blond, you can lead a die-hard M$ user to water, but you can't make them think.) - -BillT -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAZI5+uLPldPuWZnARAo8JAJ45rnyZZJjisMXNEctIhQFm0xzscQCeLbfQ 8szXBErnV27B0X+//1O+nL0= =eJzF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
