Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If stability is your concern, stay with stable. The same security > vulnerabilities that exist in 2.4 also exist in 2.6, so you really > gain nothing in terms of security by simply doing a dist-upgrade.
So I'll try that when I've finished those projects. > If you want te ensure your system won't break, then just use the > latest kernel-image or kernel-source packages from securiy.debian.org > as they will have all relevant security fixes applied. That's exactly what I am doing right now. (For those, who want to make further advantage of the thread, the address is http://www.security.debian.org, spelled with an t bevore the y.) > If you are intent on switching to 2.6, go to www.backports.org and > checkout how you can run a 2.6 kernel on Woody with the packages > they have provided. This would cause much more work than I have time to. So I don't consider that step for a while. Lots of thanks for your answers, anyway. Yours Moritz -- Wer bin ich? -- http://www.4momo.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]