On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 06:51:14PM -0300, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote: > On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 17:51:30 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote: > > > On Sunday 01 June 2003 14:49, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra > > wrote: > >> On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:39:41 +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote: > >> > > >> > The compiler version is always important (due to the nature of C). > >> > >> Any pointers to an explanation about why is that? > > > > > > Take a look at Re: Compiler choice for OSS (WAS: Re: Trouble with > > Mozilla Java plugin) tread. > > Not enough for my curiosity. >
My best guess is that the binary function interface changed somehow in an incompatible way. If its c++ it could be a change in the name mangling (no idea why they would do that, but I'm not a compiler person). > > -- > Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System > at the Tel-Aviv University CC. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
