-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:46:36PM -0500, No Spam wrote: > How about a decentralized P2P using IPv6 tunneling? I realize that it is > not a userspace daemon, but it's worth thinking about. I use comcast at > home; maybe I'll have a 6 number soon.
I got an email from them telling me that they gave us more bandwidth and to powercycle the modem. So I did. And now I've got an ip6 address in ifconfig on eth0. > If that's the case, then I'm gonna hammer my providers for 6 on my > networks, and go sshd -6 only. There may be tunneling aspects to > take advantage of for VPN. I really have not thought about it too > much. I understand ip6 is designed to be considerably better about security. Time will only tell if it works out in reality, though. > I'll need to upgrade the firmware in my portmasters for 6, if it's > available. Lots to think about. Lots to do. You knew this was coming. You were warned. 8:o) Were you thinking about any of this in advance? - -- .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAKvzbUzgNqloQMwcRAqW8AKCZ6JNoie0YS1nNHezd4hpv0h09OACcCGdZ EOQUdEKZYIzvyOWt63oEaPc= =lv5o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
