Hi, * Steve Lamb wrote (2004-02-08 11:34): >Thorsten Haude wrote: >>Funny you see it that way. For years Mutt's feature list was copied to >>the other clients todo list almost verbatim. > > Funny? That would kind of be the definition of a tech. demo. "Look, >this is neat and can do cool stuff but it is incapable of doing anything >serious or interesting unless the end user or some third party spends an >inordinate amount of time to make it passingly usable."
Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance? Don't you see how many people
use Mutt and are quite happy with it? Do you think they get money to
say so?
You shouldn't believe them if they claim that Mutt is trivial to set
up, but you can believe them that it is highly efficient.
And when I say 'feature' I don't talk about a theoretical possibility,
but about something that could actually be put to good use.
Thorsten
--
When words lose their meaning, people lose their freedom.
- Confucius
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
