On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:54:40 -0500 John Hasler <[email protected]> wrote: > The Wanderer writes: > > And, for that matter, in w3m - which, while it's an up-to-date version > > (as far as Debian testing provides, at least), is almost certainly > > less functionally capable and *is* certainly less > > mainstream-recognized than Firefox ESR. > > And with Lynx.
Tested on my system with wget, lynx, links, elinks, w3m, and Firefox 140.7.0esr. The site is accessible. No problems here. I hope it helps, David
