Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Do you have a proposal then for a forum (as in, a platform for group > >> discussion) that's more palatable to the youngsters? > > Zulip? > Discourse? > Lemmy? > > Ideally, such a thing would have good&nice bridges to&from email, but in > practice I don't know any that have such bridges (some have no such > bridge, while other have such bridges but they don't qualify as > "good&nice").
I don't know about Lemmy, but in general there aren't good bridges between email and the Fediverse. Zulip has email integration, which is not at all the same as a bridge: any given channel can have an email address, and sending to that email address can, potentially, send messages to the channel -- but they aren't much like other Zulip messages. Outbound, not so much. I don't anything about Discourse's email bridging, if any -- my possibly naive take is that email users are distinctly second class, and also web users are distinctly second class -- there really aren't many features compared to a decent email client. -dsr-
